This data only covers views on the main Lonelygirl15 account on YouTube for the past year.
Since immo mentioned there were also views on Revver here they are (note that the data range is slightly different because of the data available).
Posted by
modelmotion
at
7:49 PM
Labels: lonelygirl15
If you want to become an "author" on Web Series Today please read: http://tinyurl.com/becomeaWSTauthor
Join the discussion: http://www.tinyurl.com/webseriescommunity
"The Legend of Zoey"... 33 years later: Temporal Vortex Spiraling into a temporal vortex the passage of time warps into an il...
Anagram ServerBacon's CipherBoulter.anagramcipher morseCipher ToolsCryptogramGreek Number Converterleetkey.mozdevmorse codePurple Hell Riddle ToolsStegsecretSubstitution Cyphertheproblemsitetps_backwardsTranslation - babelTRANSLATOR, BINARYvigenere-keyedWord builderwordnavigatorwordnavigatoryellowpipe
Argentina
Australia
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Egypt
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Hong Kong
Hungary
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jamaica
Kuwait
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia
Maldives
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sudan
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Posts
wow.
ReplyDeleteNot really an accurate picture as they revver was the default player for a substantial period. Tubemogul allows for more than on service. Why not do a chart that depcts both YT and revver?
ReplyDelete-immo1
I think that this honestly may be a product, as weird as it sounds, of having so many videos. When there were days between videos, I would watch them over and over. Now I only have time to watch each once before the next is out -- which is wonderful! but may lead to these numbers.
ReplyDeleteThats a good idea to add in the Revver views. As I recall they were always relatively small compared to youtube (in the order of 20,000views/video.)
ReplyDeleteA number of factors can affect the results such as the number of videos posted on the alternate accounts. Still my guess is that the general trend is still accurate. I also suspect that now LG15 is releasing more videoes on the main account the views/month will begin to increase shortly.
ReplyDeleteWow -- that's some interesting data. What does that last big spike on the youtube views correspond to, video-wise?
ReplyDeleteI suspect that is the season 1 series finale.
ReplyDeleteParsing the data ... some clarification is needed.
ReplyDeleteThe first data point shows almost 5.4 million views for January 2007.
Does that mean there were 5.4 million views during January 2007? or does that mean that videos posted in January 2007 now have a cumulative number of views of 5.4 million?
If it is the latter, then we should always expect more recent months (in general) to have lower numbers, and for these to rise slowly as time goes on (and viewers watch past videos).
Further to my previous comment... check the data again in one month and compare to this snapshot to see whether numbers for past months continue to increase or are static.
ReplyDeleteI would think that the chart would show all the views for all the videos on that account for that month as a date point. From watching the views, a LG15 video receives the majority of its views in the first month after its release.
ReplyDeletethis is kind of a sad graph.
ReplyDeletemodelmotion, I would think otherwise. It depends on how the data is stored. Does it make sense that YouTube would store views in buckets by the time of the viewing? I don't think so. I think YouTube probably just stores the number of views per video. That means the only tie to date is the date the video was released. And that means the numbers for older months are continuing to increase over time.
ReplyDeleteIt is true that highest rate of views for a video generally occur in the days soon after a video is released. But not necessarily the majority of views for each video... they continue to rise slowly.
If my interpretation of the data is correct, then the fall of the graph as shown is a bit deceptive - classic case of the data being a different basis than most viewers would assume. It's good data, don't get me wrong, but I don't think it is being interpreted correctly.
What would be better would be a plot of cumulative views across all Lonelygirl15 videos each month - the total 'view count' number on the channel. The Creators may have that data if we ask for it.
For starters, we should defintely take the same snapshot 1 month from now and compare to this one.
I think the data is created by Tubemogul. It only begins to "log an account" is after someone on the service has begun to track it.
ReplyDeleteI think the data is created by Tubemogul. It only begins to "log an account" is after someone on the service has begun to track it.
ReplyDeleteI think the data is created by Tubemogul. It only begins to "log an account" is after someone on the service has begun to track it.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we can ask Tubemogul about the data?
ReplyDeletei think mm's interpretation is correct. tubemogul notes when they started keeping data on a channel, and it doesn't appear to lump in all old views into the first month of the data. its very believable that jan 2007 had 5.4 million youtube views.
ReplyDeletethe last spike on the youtube graph does corresponde to the season one finale (+ the season one recap vid which itself got over a million views). also, at that same time revver was ditched (as you can see on the revver graph).